In a high-stakes Game 4 playoff clash, the Boston Celtics solidified their position with a commanding performance against the Indiana Pacers. With standout contributions from Jaylen Brown and Jayson Tatum, and key support across the roster, Boston outmaneuvered Indiana in almost every department. Meanwhile, the Pacers had notable efforts from Andrew Nembhard and Pascal Siakam but fell short in execution. This article dives into the Boston Celtics vs Pacers match player stats, offering a comprehensive analysis of individual efforts, shooting percentages, and tactical decisions that defined the outcome.
A Decisive Battle Between Boston & Indiana: Overview
When the Boston Celtics faced off against the Indiana Pacers in Game 4 of the 2024 NBA Playoffs, fans anticipated a competitive battle. What they witnessed was a tactically intense game where the Celtics’ depth and defense stood out. Despite Indiana’s energetic approach and key performances, Boston maintained control from the start, closing the game with a composed 105-102 victory. Both teams had moments of brilliance, but the stat sheet revealed the Celtics’ superior efficiency and consistency. Let’s take a closer look at how each player contributed to their team’s performance in the Boston Celtics vs Pacers match player stats.
Overall Team Performance & Key Game Statistics
To set the stage, let’s evaluate the team metrics that shaped the game’s flow:
| Team | FG% | 3PT% | FT% | Rebounds(Off/Def) | Assists | Turnovers | Points |
| Boston Celtics | 47.7% | 32.3% | 80.0% | 10 / 39 | 27 | 11 | 105 |
| Indiana Pacers | 45.5% | 30.0% | 75.0% | 12 / 34 | 34 | 12 | 102 |
Although the Pacers moved the ball better, the Celtics’ rebounding and defensive focus gave them the upper hand. Their ability to close defensive possessions and capitalize on second-chance opportunities played a significant role.
Boston Celtics Vs Pacers Match Player Stats
Boston Celtics Player Stats
The Celtics relied on both their stars and bench strength to seal the win. Here’s how the main contributors fared:
Jaylen Brown:
Brown put on another playoff clinic, logging 29 points on 11-of-22 shooting, including 4 three-pointers. His shot selection was sharp, and he added 6 rebounds, 2 assists, and 3 steals, showing impact on both ends of the court.
Jayson Tatum:
Tatum showcased his versatility with a double-double: 26 points and a dominant 13 rebounds. He also distributed the ball efficiently with 8 assists. While he struggled from beyond the arc (3-of-11), his mid-range play and rebounding were crucial.
Jrue Holiday:
Holiday’s defensive presence and rebounding (9 boards) stood out. Scoring 17 points and hitting two three-pointers, he added balance to Boston’s backcourt alongside solid perimeter defense.
Derrick White:
White had one of his more complete playoff outings, 16 points, 4 rebounds, 4 assists, 5 steals, and 3 blocks. His defensive hustle disrupted Indiana’s rhythm repeatedly.
Al Horford:
Though his scoring was limited (7 points), Horford’s experience showed through with 8 rebounds and 5 assists. He kept the offense flowing and contributed on defensive switches.
Indiana Pacers Player Stats
Indiana showed flashes of competitiveness but couldn’t maintain control during key moments. Here are their key performers:
Andrew Nembhard:
The young guard had a breakout game, scoring 24 points on 10-of-18 shooting while dishing out 10 assists. He showed impressive composure and was Indiana’s main offensive engine.
Pascal Siakam:
Siakam added 19 points and 6 rebounds. Although he shot 8-of-18 from the field, his scoring helped keep Indiana in contention during scoring droughts.
TJ McConnell:
A spark off the bench, McConnell contributed 15 points and 4 assists, constantly pushing the tempo and keeping Boston’s defense on edge.
Obi Toppin:
Toppin’s 12 points and 7 rebounds provided much-needed energy. His athleticism helped the Pacers keep pace on the boards, though it wasn’t enough to swing momentum.
Aaron Nesmith:
With 14 points and 6 rebounds, Nesmith showed effort and versatility, though he struggled with shooting efficiency (4-of-11 FG, 1-of-6 from 3-point range).
Tactical Analysis & Turning Points
One of the major takeaways from the Boston Celtics vs Pacers match player stats was Boston’s ability to close quarters strong. The Celtics’ physical defense, especially in the second half, forced Indiana into rushed possessions. Boston capitalized on those errors with transition points, led by Brown and Holiday.
Another critical factor was rebounding. The Celtics outrebounded the Pacers 49-46, but more importantly, their 10 offensive boards turned into key second-chance points. Tatum and Horford were particularly active in securing loose balls.
Indiana’s high turnover rate (12) also cost them several scoring opportunities. Despite their superior assist numbers, they failed to convert enough open looks, particularly from three-point range.
Bench Impact & Rotational Depth
While Boston’s starting five carried the scoring load, bench players like Sam Hauser and Payton Pritchard chipped in with crucial minutes. Hauser hit a timely three and added a block, while Pritchard offered pace and spacing.
Indiana, on the other hand, leaned more heavily on their bench due to inconsistent starter production. McConnell and Toppin gave solid minutes, but players like Ben Sheppard and Doug McDermott had minimal impact.
Final Thoughts
In one of the most strategically intense games, the Boston Celtics once again demonstrated why they are contenders. The Boston Celtics vs Pacers match player stats tell a story of experience, composure, and depth of our matching effort and youth. While Indiana had standout moments, Boston’s two-way discipline ultimately sealed the win. Going forward, Indiana will need to tighten their defensive rotations and improve shot selection under pressure. For Boston, the formula remains clear: rely on their stars, defend as a unit, and let their depth carry them through a grueling playoff series.
